B2B ultrasound repair & tested partsGlobal shippingEmail quote intakeNeed help? info@rongtaomedical.comLanguage: English
Rongtao Medical
RONGTAO MEDICAL
ULTRASOUND REPAIR · PROBE SOLUTIONS · TESTED PARTS
Contact Us
Repair Guides · 12 min read · Rongtao Medical

Ultrasound QA Baseline Drift? Check the Phantom Before Repair

Check the phantom’s condition, temperature and test setup when uniformity, penetration or caliper measurements shift. Use a controlled repeat to decide whether the phantom, probe or console needs evaluation.

Illustrated ultrasound test phantom beside icons for temperature, weight and the QA checklist.

Why Does a Phantom-Based QA Result Drift?

A drop in penetration, a new band of uneven brightness or a shifted caliper distance can begin with the reference phantom, the acquisition setup or the scanner and transducer. Start with the baseline image and settings. Identify what changed, which phantom and probe produced the original measurement, and whether the result crossed a facility action level. Keep the first abnormal result in the record even if a repeat comes back within limits.

The American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) recommends following the phantom manufacturer’s care and certification or recertification schedule, and marking the production and recommended recertification dates on the phantom. Its guidance also calls for preserving baseline and periodic test records. A QA result from a different or unverified reference object may need a controlled repeat before it can support a service decision. 1

Escalate a suspected equipment hazard or clinical image problem through the facility’s safety process while the QA discrepancy is investigated. Under the American College of Radiology (ACR) ultrasound accreditation guidance, out-of-limit results require corrective action. Imminent danger to patients or staff requires immediate action and notification. The ACR recommends performing and documenting acceptance testing after correction. 3

For related decisions, use the ultrasound preventive maintenance checklist for program-level tasks, the probe acceptance protocol for post-repair evaluation, and the probe-versus-scanner artifact guide for a reproducible imaging fault.

What Should Be Checked Before the Scanner?

The sequence below assumes a nonpatient QA test under a facility protocol. Keep the initial images and change one variable at a time where practical. Record which change restored comparability or whether several changes were needed, since that affects how confidently you can assign the cause.

CheckEvidence to compareNext action
1. Identity and conditionMatch the phantom serial number to the baseline. Check its certificate, weight trend, housing and scan surface. 1 2Set aside a damaged phantom and resolve any mismatch with the baseline reference. For a 040GSE, contact the manufacturer if the surface is depressed or a weight change above 1% accompanies a vertical-distance change.
2. Temperature and storageRecord storage and transport conditions, the equilibration start time and the room temperature at testing. For the 040GSE, allow at least 24 hours at room temperature. The best-accuracy target of 22 °C ± 1 °C refers to the phantom itself. 2If freezing, excessive heat or impact is suspected, check the phantom against its manufacturer’s handling guidance before reuse. If the phantom is fit for use and the temperature hold was incomplete, preserve the initial result and repeat after equilibration.
3. Acquisition and techniqueMatch the probe, port, test target, preset and acquisition settings. Use the same scan plane, coupling method and caliper landmarks. 2 5Repeat against the original baseline with the recorded setup. Flag missing settings or a changed probe or phantom before drawing a trend conclusion.
4. Persistent findingAsk qualified staff to choose a complementary probe test and, where supported, repeat with a known-good compatible probe or on another approved port. 3 6A finding that follows a probe supports probe evaluation. A finding that stays with a port or repeats across compatible known-good probes supports console evaluation. Keep mixed results open for further investigation.
Four checks before routing an ultrasound repair

Source: Editorial workflow based on AIUM, the CIRS 040GSE guide, ACR and Vuorenmaa et al.

Save the actual acquisition settings alongside the preset name. A preset can keep the same label after its contents change. Record depth, overall gain, time-gain compensation, output, focus and processing, including harmonics or compounding when used. The CIRS guide bases repeat measurements on the same recorded technique. If an old baseline lacks these settings, record that uncertainty and ask the QA lead how to proceed. 2

Technique can move the reading even with the preset matched. The CIRS guide warns that pressing on the scan surface can temporarily displace the wires during vertical-distance testing. Match the original target group and caliper landmarks. The 040GSE guide measures penetration from the scanning surface to the last discernible background echoes. Wire targets may still be visible deeper in the image. 2

How Do Temperature and Storage Change the Measurement?

When a test object has just arrived from a loading dock or an unconditioned store, its interior may still be warmer or colder than the room. Temperature can change sound speed and the apparent distances on the scanner. The 040GSE guide uses a room-temperature hold to allow its core to equilibrate. Record the time and room conditions, and record phantom temperature only where the approved method provides a reading. 2

The 040GSE contains a water-based Zerdine hydrogel in a housing with a scanning membrane. The guide describes moisture loss through the membrane, possible cracking or housing damage after freeze-thaw, and faster vapor loss in extreme heat. A temperature-controlled repeat can address thermal mismatch. Evidence of surface damage or a trend in weight calls for separate review. 2

Sun Nuclear lists nominal sound speeds of 1,540 m/s for its Zerdine and HE gels and 1,450 m/s for ATS urethane. Its guide explains how target positioning can compensate for a material’s sound speed and how attenuation varies by material. For a different phantom, use its documented expected measurements and baseline. An apparent distance or penetration shift across two materials gives limited evidence about scanner drift. 4

FindingWhat to documentNext action
Water-based phantom, missing cover or falling weightSerial number, certificate weight, recent trend, storage conditions, case and cover. 2 4Inspect the membrane and housing. Check the exact manufacturer guidance and trend the weight in a consistent weighing setup.
Urethane reference introducedNew model and serial number, target group, test method and its own baseline. 4Treat measurements across materials as a setup change and review the new reference with the facility QA lead.
Cold or hot deliveryReceipt time, conditions, equilibration start and test room temperature. 2Check for damage and follow the manufacturer’s handling guidance after suspected freezing, excessive heat or impact. If the phantom is fit for use, repeat after the specified hold.
Depressed, torn or damaged surfacePhotos of the housing and scan surface, recent weight and any relevant saved QA images. 2 4Set aside the phantom and contact the manufacturer. Follow its damaged-phantom handling instructions.
What storage and handling changes tell you

Source: CIRS 040GSE User Guide and Sun Nuclear Ultrasound Selection Guide.

For routine care of the 040GSE, CIRS specifies cleaning after each use with mild soap and water only, and room-temperature storage in the provided airtight case with the storage cover attached. If the scan surface is damaged, the guide calls for sealing the phantom in an airtight container and contacting the manufacturer immediately for return instructions. Follow the transducer’s own instructions for probe care. 2

How Do You Separate Phantom Drift From Probe or Scanner Drift?

Three comparisons can appear on the same worksheet. The first is phantom weight against its certificate. The second is an observed QA result against the historical result for that setup. The third is caliper error against the target’s known distance. Identify the comparison and reference before applying any numerical limit.

The 040GSE guide calls for weighing at least annually against the original certificate weight. It specifies manufacturer contact for a gain or loss of more than 1% together with a vertical-distance difference, or a depressed surface at any weight. For noticeable changes to the phantom, take it out of QA use and follow the manufacturer’s return instructions promptly. Sun Nuclear’s later hydrogel guidance recommends weighing every six months and identifies weight loss near 1% as one sign of advanced desiccation. Check which instructions apply to the unit and record the inspection schedule your team uses. 2 4

The historical AAPM Task Group No. 1 report gives suggested B-mode caliper levels based on error relative to the expected distance. Its horizontal criterion uses the larger of the millimeter and percent values. For illustration, if a phantom has a documented horizontal reference of 120 mm, 2% is 2.4 mm. A reading of 123 mm would exceed that suggested action level. Use the facility’s current protocol and the scanner’s stated accuracy to judge the measurement. The CIRS guide assigns allowable drift from the QA baseline to the facility. 2 5

CheckPublished referenceHow to apply it
Temperature for the 040GSEAt least 24 hours at room temperature before use. Best accuracy at 22 °C ± 1 °C. 2Use the guide for the specific phantom and log actual conditions.
Weight for the 040GSEWeigh at least annually against the certificate. Contact the manufacturer for a change above 1% paired with a vertical-distance difference, or for a depressed surface. 2Sun Nuclear recommends six-month weighing for hydrogel phantoms. A weight result is one part of reference assessment. 4
Vertical distanceTable I gives errors above 1.5 mm or 1.5% as the suggested action criterion, and above 2 mm or 2% as the suggested defect criterion. 5Compare error against the known target distance and use the facility’s applicable protocol.
Horizontal distanceTable I uses the larger of 2 mm and 2% for the suggested action level, and the larger of 3 mm and 3% for the suggested defect level. 5Use the known target distance to calculate the percentage and verify probe alignment before scoring the measurement.
040GSE instructions and historical caliper benchmarks

Source: CIRS 040GSE User Guide, Sun Nuclear Ultrasound Selection Guide and AAPM Task Group No. 1, Table I.

Once the setup is comparable, a normal phantom uniformity image still gives only one view of probe performance. Vuorenmaa and colleagues tested 99 transducers with a FirstCall electronic tester at two Finnish tertiary hospitals. At the hospital where the authors compared all three methods, 37 of 65 probes received all three tests. Probe type or technical issues prevented the other 28 from being included. The uniformity assessment used either a CIRS 040GSE or an UltraiQ phantom. In the 37-probe subgroup, FirstCall and in-air reverberation each classified 10 as defective, and phantom uniformity classified five. 6

Probes classified as defective by each method
FirstCall element sensitivitytestProbes classified as defective (%): 2727%In-air reverberation testProbes classified as defective (%): 2727%Phantom uniformity testProbes classified as defective (%): 13.513.5%
View chart data
CategoryProbes classified as defective (%)
FirstCall element sensitivity test27
In-air reverberation test27
Phantom uniformity test13.5

The same 37 probes from one hospital received all three tests. The study grouped weak and malfunctioning probes as defective.

  • All three tests agreed on 29 of 37 probes (78.4%). The proportions describe how the methods classified this subgroup. The study did not estimate test sensitivity against an independent reference or measure fleet failure rates.

Source: Vuorenmaa et al. (2025), Results.

FirstCall flagged six probes that phantom uniformity classified as functional. One probe was flagged only by the in-air test, so the two tests with equal totals flagged different sets of probes. The authors found visual in-air assessment useful as a first screen on suitable probes. The comparison excluded phased-array probes because their in-air and uniformity images could not be evaluated visually. The authors also describe limits of visual in-air testing for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probes. Have qualified staff choose a compatible method under the applicable protocol. 6

If caliper error persists, Goodsitt and colleagues describe repeating the measurement with a second phantom. For that comparison, use a reference with documented condition and target spacing. Compare each reading with the expected distance for its phantom and method. If the error occurs with only one phantom, recheck its condition, temperature and coupling. If it persists across references, have qualified staff compare an approved alternate port or a compatible known-good probe under matched conditions. The result can guide probe or console evaluation. Identifying a failed board requires further testing. 5

For example, suppose a 040GSE still reads long on a vertical target after equilibration and weighs 1.25% less than its certificate weight. Even with an intact-looking surface, that combination meets the manufacturer’s contact criterion. Set the 040GSE aside and use a documented second phantom with the same scanner and probe. If the second phantom gives its expected reading, include both results in the manufacturer enquiry. If it also reads long, keep the phantom enquiry open and ask qualified staff to investigate the shared scanner, probe and acquisition setup. 2 5

When Should the Phantom Be Replaced or Recertified?

Keep the original baseline and abnormal result while the QA lead decides whether to repeat the measurement, withdraw the reference, or establish a new baseline. A scanner adjustment or a fresh baseline can erase the evidence needed to explain an unresolved shift.

Use the manufacturer’s evaluation or reinspection route if the reference object itself is suspect. Include its model and serial number, condition photos, weight history and any saved QA images. 4

  • Visible damage or depression. Withdraw the phantom from QA use. For a damaged 040GSE scan surface, follow the guide’s sealing and return instructions and contact the manufacturer. If the housing is breached, follow the guide’s precautions for exposed gel. A depressed surface also warrants manufacturer contact. 2
  • Weight and geometry changed together. On a 040GSE, a change of more than 1% from certificate weight paired with a vertical-distance change meets the guide’s contact criterion. Check that the weight was compared on a like-for-like basis. 2
  • Reference history is incomplete. If a recertification date or certificate is missing, confirm the applicable schedule and records with the manufacturer and QA lead. When another phantom is introduced, retain its serial number and record the comparison or new baseline separately. 1 2

For ACR ultrasound accreditation, a qualified medical physicist or designee performs the required annual survey. The ACR allows up to 14 months between surveys. Its annual survey table lists geometric accuracy as optional and calls for uniformity evidence from a phantom or other test object. For routine quality control (QC), the ACR accepts an in-air-only uniformity assessment. It recommends routine QC generally at least semiannually and lists it as optional for accreditation. Label each record with its test method and purpose. Use the facility’s return-to-service process to verify correction and decide whether a new baseline is warranted after a repair, probe change or approved preset change. 3

What Belongs in the QA Record and the Repair Handoff?

A short record can make the follow-up test reproducible. Save the baseline image, the initial abnormal image and the repeat in the facility’s QA system. In the work order, state which inputs matched, which changed and which were unknown. Mark unavailable measurements explicitly so a blank field does not read as a passed check.

The template extends the machine settings and result fields in CIRS Appendix 1 with reference condition and disposition. Use it alongside the facility’s existing QA documentation. 2

Record fieldWhat to capture
Asset and referenceFacility or test location, scanner OEM/model/serial/software, probe model/serial and port, phantom model/serial, baseline date, certificate reference and recommended recertification date where applicable.
Phantom conditionCase and cover, housing and membrane condition, certificate and current weight, scale and weighing configuration, percentage change and prior weights.
Test conditionsStorage location, transport or storage excursion, equilibration start and scan time, room temperature, measured phantom temperature if available, operator and test method.
Acquisition and resultsPreset and recorded settings, scan target and plane, coupling and caliper landmarks, expected or historical value, first result and controlled repeat, image IDs and applicable action level.
Disposition and ownerReference withdrawn, repeat pending, baseline revised under QA approval, or probe/console assessment requested. Include the reason, responsible reviewer and next action.
Phantom condition and baseline comparison record

Source: Adapted from CIRS Model 040GSE Appendix 1 and AIUM baseline record guidance.

When to involve Rongtao Medical

Rongtao Medical provides independent ultrasound probe evaluation, board repair and system diagnostics. A result that follows a probe or persists on the console with a known-good probe helps scope that work. Ask the phantom manufacturer about evaluation and recertification. The facility coordinates accreditation surveys and decides when to return equipment to clinical service. 7 4 3

Send the controlled repeat and the open question. When the symptom is reproducible but still poorly localized, ask for system or probe evaluation before requesting a particular board. Share only nonpatient test images and the equipment details needed for the enquiry.

Handoff fieldEvidence to include
Equipment and symptomOEM, exact scanner and probe model, relevant software version, port, error message if any, and the conditions that reproduce the symptom.
Part identityManufacturer part number and revision if already identified. Include clear photos of accessible labels and both sides of a board only when qualified staff already have safe access.
QA comparisonPhantom model and serial number, certificate and current weight if relevant, equilibration and room conditions, matched settings, baseline and repeat findings.
Isolation and quote scopeProbe or port comparison, suitable test result if available, repair or replacement request, quantity and destination.
What to send with a repair enquiry

Source: Rongtao Medical service intake guidance.

For a probe-specific finding, use the probe repair service. For a suspected console fault, review ultrasound repair services or send the test summary through the contact form for scope and a quote.

Frequently Asked Questions

What if the result returns to baseline after the phantom reaches room temperature?
Keep both runs and record the change in conditions. If the acquisition setup was held constant, the comparison supports a thermal explanation. The QA lead can decide whether further testing is needed, especially if there is a separate clinical complaint or signs of phantom damage.

How often should the 040GSE be weighed?
The model guide specifies at least once a year against the certificate weight. Sun Nuclear’s later care guide recommends every six months for hydrogel phantoms, including Zerdine. Use the instructions for the unit and record the weighing schedule in the QA plan. 2 4

What if the original phantom serial number is unknown?
Record the missing link and preserve the old result. Ask the QA lead to identify the reference or establish a controlled comparison with a documented phantom. Treat the old-to-new trend as uncertain.

How do I record percentage weight change?
Subtract the certificate weight from the current weight, divide by the certificate weight, and multiply by 100. Record the direction of change and the two weights. For example, a change from 4,000 g to 3,950 g is a 1.25% loss. On a 040GSE, also document vertical-distance findings and the surface condition when evaluating the manufacturer contact criteria. 2

What if the weight is stable but the surface is visibly depressed?
For the 040GSE, a depressed scan surface is an independent reason to contact the manufacturer. Set the phantom aside and document the finding with the QA lead. 2

Sources

  1. American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM), Routine Quality Assurance of Clinical Ultrasound Equipment, version 2.0 (2020). See page 4, “What Is the Role of Phantoms?” The AIUM Resource Library lists the guide and requires member sign-in for the PDF.
  2. Computerized Imaging Reference Systems (CIRS), Model 040GSE User Guide, publication 040GSE UG 102620. See Handling and Care, General Guidelines for Performing Measurements, Establishing a Baseline, and Appendix 1. Manufacturer document hosted by a distributor.
  3. American College of Radiology (ACR), Quality Control: Ultrasound and Breast Ultrasound, revised April 9, 2025. See Acceptance Testing (Optional), Annual Survey (Required) and Quality Control Tests (Optional).
  4. Sun Nuclear, Ultrasound Selection Guide and Frequently Asked Questions (2025), MKTG-5853. Covers Zerdine hydrogel and ATS urethane, storage, inspection, recommended six-month hydrogel weighing and manufacturer reinspection options.
  5. Goodsitt MM et al. Real-time B-mode ultrasound quality control test procedures. AAPM Report No. 65, Medical Physics 25 (1998), 1385–1406, DOI 10.1118/1.598404. See Table I (p. 1388) for historical suggested levels and section VII.A.6 (p. 1394) for the second-phantom comparison.
  6. Vuorenmaa A et al. Comparison of Three Quality Assurance Methods for Clinical Ultrasound Devices. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering 45 (2025), 147–155. See Results and Discussion for the 37-probe comparison and method limitations.
  7. Rongtao Medical, Ultrasound board, probe and equipment repair services. Service lines and scope for board repair, probe evaluation and system diagnostics.

Talk to Rongtao Medical

Rongtao Medical is an ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 9001:2015 independent ultrasound service provider — board-level repair, tested replacement parts, and 48-hour real-machine testing for partners in 140+ countries.